Tila Tequila Exclusive!!

Ok readers, your pal Spin has an exclusive about Tila Tequila from someone who went to high school with her in Houston, Texas! That's right bishes, Tila went to high school in Houston!

 According to my source, Tila then was a sweet girl, nice to hang with and hung out with the "in" asian fashion crowd. My source had nothing bad to say about her. Source said they knew Tila 3 years since Tila graduated a year before her. When I  asked what the source thought happened to her and my source said they really don't know, she used to be so nice.

 I also asked about Tila's claims of having been in juvie. My source said they weren't that close but had Tila been gone for an extended period for something like that, it would have been noticed.

 So there you go, kids! Is Tila a liar? Maybe now. Tweeker? Hanging out with Casey Johnson knowing she was an addict? Possible! what happened to the amicable, nice Tila? Did she kill that part of her with her myspace and mtv ambitions?

now Tila is claiming she is pregnant.  I feel sorry for her.

2. I love Casey So much! Please stop with the NEGATIVE & let's remember how beautiful she was & to me http://tinyurl.com/ye2jyo9-Retweetabout 4 hours ago from web
3. Thank u everyone for your kind words. I am off to bedrest again now. I have let go of all anger inside of me. It feels so good! TTYL! xoxoabout 4 hours ago from web
4. My Wife has passed away and all I have left is the baby. I wish mean people can just respect the dead and respect a new life growing inside!about 4 hours ago from web
5. The doctor i visited says that all this stress and negative people around me getting me upset, can affect the baby in a bad way. Pls stop.about 4 hours ago from web
6.   
   Let me know when you're all ready to see the old happy Tila back cuz I'm ready...Once ur all ready... I will tell u what the good news is!
   
   

As was expected...

Tila Tequila is a liar. From gawker.com:

As predicted, the DA dropped the charges against Shawne Merriman alleging that he'd physically abused Tila Tequila late one night last week. Because, really, when was the last time someone with the surname "Tequila" was a credible witness? Guilty until proven Herradura, at least. Meanwhile, Merriman continues on his jolly way back to the first week of the NFL season, where he will take place in a delicate sport populated by upstanding young men whose clean-cut reputation for this kind of thing moves further along. Oh, and lesson for all of you: don't go crazy on Twitter next time you get cops involved. Because it just means you're guilty or lying.

Oh, and it sounds like Merriman proposed to have a foursome with him, Tequila (Tila), and two other women, who he had over at his house when Ms. Tequila showed up. At the time, Tila went batshit like any girlfriend reasonably would, and Merriman had to restrain her, and there's a one week gossip cycle. Next.

her drunk tweets as posted by ONTD

and her stupid lie about being allergic to alcohol

*so Tila, for fuck's sake:*

Hopalong Mills a Liar but divorce settled

Sorry it's so long. from gossip rocks:

In his full ruling on the McCartney divorce, the judge was highly critical of Heather Mills's evidence. Mr Justice Bennett wrote:
"The husband’s evidence was, in my judgment, balanced. He expressed himself moderately though at times with justifiable irritation, if not anger. He was consistent, accurate and honest.
"But I regret to have to say I cannot say the same about the wife’s evidence.

He went on to criticise Miss Mills's claims:
"I have to say I cannot accept the wife’s case that she was wealthy and independent by the time she met the husband in the middle of 1999. Her problem stems from the lack of any documentary evidence to support her case as to the level of her earnings."

He continued:
"During her cross-examination she asserted for the first time that in addition to property assets she had £2m-£3m in the bank. No mention of such assets was made in her affidavit. There is no documentary evidence to support that assertion. During the hearing she was asked repeatedly to produce bank statements, which she said she thought she had in Brighton, to verify this claim. No bank statements were ever produced.
"I do not doubt that she modelled successfully and was a public speaker. But the investigation in this case of her assets and earnings as at 1999 when the parties met do not bear out her case."

After addressing her financial claims in detail, he concluded:
"I find that the wife’s case as to her wealth in 1999 to be wholly exaggerated."

After analysing the couple's finances, the judge dismissed Miss Mills's claim that their cohabitation began in March 2000:
"I reject the wife’s case on this issue. Thus, their true and settled relationship lasted from marriage (June 2002) and not from March 2000."

He was sceptical about Miss Mills's claims that her husband hampered her own career:
"There are other examples, in my judgment, which, contrary to the wife’s case, show that the husband was supportive of, or furthered, the wife’s career."

He cited the example of a lecture series in the US run by a man called Mr Benia. Miss Mills had claimed that Sir Paul prevented her from doing further lectures:
"The husband, in my judgment, gave compelling evidence that no-one tells the wife what to do. This accords with his written evidence that the wife is very strong willed. Indeed watching the wife give evidence and present her case she came across to me as strong willed and very determined. I have no doubt that had the wife really wanted to contract for dates through Mr Benia she would have done it and the husband would not have stood in her way."

Addressing Miss Mills's claim that Sir Paul failed to contribute to her charity work:
"I have to say that the facts as I find them to be do not support the wife’s case. Within two months of the parties meeting in May 1999 the husband donated £150,000 to the wife’s charity (the Heather Mills Health Trust). In December 2002 and again in December 2003 the husband made a gift of £250,000 outright to the wife, thus plainly giving her the opportunity to make donations to charity."

He concluded:
"I find that, far from the husband dictating to and restricting the wife’s career and charitable activities, he did the exact opposite, as he says. He encouraged it and lent his support, name and reputation to her business and charitable activities. The facts as I find them do not in any way support her claim. “Compensation” therefore does not arise."

He went on to acknowledge Miss Mills's role as a wife and mother, but rejected her claim that her commitment to the marriage was "exceptional":
"In my judgment the picture painted by the husband of the wife’s part in his emotional and professional life is much closer to reality than the wife’s account. The wife, as the husband said, enjoys being the centre of attention. Her presence on his tours came about because she loved the husband, enjoyed being there and because she thoroughly enjoyed the media and public attention.
"I am prepared to accept that her presence was emotionally supportive to him but to suggest that in some way she was his “business partner” is, I am sorry to have to say, make-belief."

He continued:
"I have to say that the wife’s evidence that in some way she was the husband’s “psychologist”, even allowing for hyperbole, is typical of her make-belief. I reject her evidence that she, vis-à-vis the husband, was anything more than a kind and loving person who was deeply in love with him, helped him through his grieving and like any new wife tried to integrate into their relationship the children of his former marriage.

"I wholly reject her account that she rekindled the husband’s professional flame and gave him back his confidence."

and listened to her give evidence, having studied the documents, and having given in her favour every allowance for the enormous strain she must have been under (and in conducting her own case) I am driven to the conclusion that much of her evidence, both written and oral, was not just inconsistent and inaccurate but also less than candid. Overall she was a less than impressive witness."

What a LIAR!!!

Does anybody believe this shit???

off of yahoonews.com:

NEW YORK - Lindsay Lohan is making plans for life after rehab. The 21-year-old actress reportedly checked out of the Cirque Lodge, a drug and alcohol treatment center in Utah, on Friday. She had entered treatment in August after reaching a plea deal on misdemeanor drunken driving and cocaine charges following two arrests.

"It was a sobering experience," Lohan says in an interview with OK! magazine. "It was humbling. It made me look at myself, and all of the people, places and things in my life in a different way. I was in there for substance abuse, after all."

Staying sober and out of Los Angeles is Lohan's main priority.

"I'm staying in Utah until it's time to shoot 'Dare to Love Me,' and then I plan on returning to Utah so I can stay focused, and avoid other distractions," she tells OK!

When asked whether she's worried about a relapse, Lohan says: "Of course I am! If I wasn't I'd be living in denial. Temptation is always there but now I'll avoid it the right way."

Lohan who recently reunited with her father, Michael Lohan, after a 3 1/2-year estrangement tells In Touch Weekly that her parents' divorce triggered her behavior.

"The trouble in my family resulted in me rebelling and doing things to get my parents' attention," she says. "But all in all, it's better for me now to have them (in my life). It's healthy."

Lohan says she's cutting out the people who encouraged her substance abuse.

"Those are the ones who are around me for the wrong reasons," she says. "The people who want to go out and party, that's not what I am about now."

and this off of Ted C.'s site:

LiLo had been calling her Hell-Ay buds. Good news: She was laughing. Bad news: It was at us.

“She thinks it’s so funny that everybody’s worried about her,” revealed a Lohan bud to Desk Awful. “She says, ‘Oh, what a pitiful girl, they must all be saying,’ and then she breaks into hysterics,” added the somewhat nonplussed amiga, who included the following little verbal baby I simply adore ‘cause it’s just so very real-life Mean Girls:

“And she doesn’t like Britney taking away all the attention, either.”

Now that’s the reason Lindsay Lohan is a star. Because she is pitiful and because she thrives on it. Too fab! Oh, forget those acting chops she never seems overly interested in utilizing these days. The bitch is a real-life Neely O’Hara, I’m tellin’ ya! (And if you don’t know who that is, you’re reading the wrong column.)

Oh! Oh! Oh! Here’s the best: Ms. L, natch, was already making back-to-Hell-Ay plans with her slobbering, derriere-licking entourage. Guess which paparazzi stop is first on the list? The Ivy, of course.

“She just craves it,” blurted the L.L. bud, regarding publicity (and other substances, one assumes). Yeah, real shocker there.

SOOO Funny!

And shows how everyone knows how full of shit Pari$ is....for instance, this off of celebslam, pointing out how she lies, even to Larry King:

Larry King: Have you ever been addicted to drugs?

Paris Hilton: No

Larry: Taken drugs?

Paris: No

Larry: Never taken drugs?

Paris: Uh-Uh

I guess when you lie all the time, it just seems natural after a while....or it's just too hard to keep track of it all

and this, apparently filmed in a coffeehouse in the Netherlands...