Sunday, June 17, 2007

Lainey sums it up:


I couldn't have said it better:

Pregnant for Freedom?

Rumours have been swirling for a week or so now – that Nicole Richie is pregnant, based first on a photo of her with a bulgy belly (always a reliable indication) and then because some tabloid pushed the story forward.

Ever the clever publicity whore, Nicole has remained silent on the issue, much in the same way she remains silent on most of her issues knowing more people will talk about them if she doesn’t talk about it them herself. Now Page Six is jumping into the fray claiming that Nicole is indeed with Joel Madden’s child and that she is keeping it to avoid prison time stemming from her own DUI incident during which she drove the wrong way on a freeway.

No idea whether or not it’s true. Smutty sense is curiously radio silent on this one. Having said that, she did have a nice glow about her at the YSL event the other night, not that that means a lot. Or anything at all. Because predicting pregnancy through bump watch is highly unreliable.

So far this year the following should have given birth by now if based on that unscientific speculation:

Halle Berry, Demi Moore (ongoing), Angelina Jolie (3 times), Jennifer Lopez (2 times), and the mother of all mothers-not-to-be: Nicole Kidman… none of whom turned out to be expecting.

Besides, can someone as malnourished as Nicole even get pregnant? Or ovulate? Thoughts?

No comments: